OK -- I found these responses only on Friday morning (GMT) and had not
done anything about them anyway.
I was going to suggest replacing the code with
sage: A, gens = E.abelian_group(); A
Multiplicative Abelian Group isomorphic to C5
with a remark in the text that the actual generators should be
expected to vary from run to run. If you think that is better to have
in this document then we can always change it for 2.10.3.
John
On 21/02/2008, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 22, 12:04 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > alpha2 built fine for me
> >
> > make check found this:
>
>
> Hi John,
>
>
> > sage -t const.tex
> > **********************************************************************
> > File "const.py", line 3200:
> > : G = E.abelian_group(); G
> > Expected:
> > (Multiplicative Abelian Group isomorphic to C5, ((1 : 0 : 1),))
> > Got:
> > (Multiplicative Abelian Group isomorphic to C5, ((0 : 0 : 1),))
> >
> > but that's a "random" effect since any one of 4 generators for this
> > group might be output. Is there a way of saying it's random in
> > const.tex?
>
>
> Yep, just like in the regular doctests. The issue has already been
> fixed and the patch is in what will become 2.10.2.rc0 within hours.
>
> Interestingly applying #1947 lead to two new doctest failures: #2251
> and #2252. A binary for sage.math that shows the problems is at
>
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.2/sage-sage-2.10.2.rc0ish-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
>
> > John
> >
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> >
>
--
John Cremona
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
