On Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 7:17:33 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > *Recommendation:* Keep MONOREPO for all distributions that fill the > sage.PAC.KAGE.MODULE namespace (= distribution packages named *sagemath-... > *-- according to my recommendation in part I). > > *Recommendation: *For distributions that do not use the > sage.PAC.KAGE.MODULE namespace (= distribution packages named something > other than sagemath-... -- according to my recommendation in part I), weigh > the benefits vs. drawbacks of MONOREPO vs. MULTIREPO. It is also simple > enough for a distribution to start out being developed inside of the Sage > MONOREPO and to be split out to a separate repository later. >
I think these are the right choices, at least for now. Once modularization is complete, perhaps MULTIREPO becomes viable, as it is for scipy, but until the work is done I don't think it is clear how one would want to subdivide it. Best, Nathan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/a8470cc0-a3dc-419c-9fd0-c892168bb20cn%40googlegroups.com.
