Hi, There's is a discussion right now on HN about LLM's trained on code
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35657982 One of the comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35658118 points out that most of the non-GPL super permissive licenses require explicit attribution when creating derived works. If the output of an LLM is a derived work (and not just some fair use of that input), then there is legally nothing particularly special about GPL in the context of training LLM's. That I think successfully undercuts my point in starting this thread. -- William On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 1:47 AM Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know I am minority, but I recommend not to use github (owned by m$). > > IMHO m$ are evil and technically incompetent. > They buy stuff and later spoil it. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAGUWgD8j71OEw7LdzhWUDjy7B8-A2ENHZQeTxT7E88nKJnVGjw%40mail.gmail.com. -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CACLE5GD27TsLbSkaMHGwSQ_pyQ83CT-O7BiA73tGZ2zgM3GXcw%40mail.gmail.com.
