On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Nils Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I tried the first example below in sage. It failed , complaining that
>  maxima wanted to know whether x was positive, negative or 0. Hence, I
>  tried maxima via "sage -maxima". To my surprise, maxima computed the
>  limit without asking for extra information. Is the maxima that gets
>  called from sage put in a more inquisitive mode?
>
>  I figure this might be a symptom of a sub-optimal interaction between
>  sage and maxima and hence might have some interest to developers.

This is almost certainly related to us putting Maxima in "complex numbers"
mode by default, since Maxima's non-complex mode is very stupid in numerous
ways, as Paul Zimmerman has pointed out.

>
>  
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>  %sage
>  var('p x')
>  limit((p+1)/pi*(1-x^2/4)/((sqrt(p)+sqrt(1/p))^2-x^2),p=oo)
>
>  //complains that maxima wants extra information
>
>  
> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>  %maxima
>  f(p,x):=(p+1)/pi*(1-x^2/4)/((sqrt(p)+sqrt(1/p))^2-x^2);
>  limit(f(p,x),p, infinity);
>
>  //works

The issue is that you're passing in "infinity" which *not* what
Sage converts oo to:

sage: maxima(oo)
inf
sage: maxima('infinity')
infinity

Maxima has the "brilliant" design that inf = real infinity and
infinity = complex infinity:

(%i8) describe(infinity);
 -- Constant: infinity
     `infinity' represents complex infinity.
(%o8)                                true
(%i9) describe(inf);
 -- Constant: inf
     `inf' represents real positive infinity.

I guess Maxima must not have a referee system for their code...

Anyway, I'm not sure what to do about this.  I don't even know what
"complex infinity" means...
But hopefully this sheds some light.

By the way, if you ever design a computer algebra system, please don't
make inf and infinity be
two different kinds of infinity. Gees that's almost as confusing as
making Matrix and matrix
drastically different[*].

 -- William

[*] Maple does this.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to