On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:50 PM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:01 PM François Bissey <frp.bis...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On 16/04/24 04:41, kcrisman wrote: >> > SageMath has several other long-term contributors who also package >> > software. We're all roughly on the same page about what it would >> take >> > to fix the sage installation for end users. >> > >> > >> > And some of these people (perhaps kiwifb?) have not been as directly >> > involved in some of the recent disputes. Maybe there is a path >> forward >> > (I also presume the CoCC is thinking about this). >> >> I would say I have involved myself too much already. I am regularly >> asked to review some of those tickets that are disputed or become >> disputed. >> >> It floods my inbox and makes my heart sink. >> > > Well, on the latest disputed PR > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37796 I proposed > to stop with this all and go back to getting the PRs approved by consensus. > > Should we call an urgent general vote on this? > I'm happy to discuss whether we should change course on this, but it should be in another thread. On the original topic, I'm +1 for including python_build. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAChs6_mhaDuY_0VGB5nT0xOUvTeGfdSj8MF%3DFR44fnygtzTiOw%40mail.gmail.com.
