Hi! I want to hear your opinions about a little problem.
The following bug is already reported as #2232:
"1.digits(16,'0123456789abcdef')" returns "['1']"
but "0.digits(16,'0123456789abcdef')" returns "[]" (and not "['0']"
as i wish)
So i started looking at the code to fix this little problem.
But it looks like this was (maybe) intended, because the docstring
says something like "0 has 0 digits", and so in particular
"0.digits(base=10)" returns "[]".
And here is my question:
Should "0.digits(base=10)" return "[]" or "[0]" (which i prefer, but
i'm here to get your opinions)
Clearly i can just fix my first problem
("0.digits(16,'0123456789abcdef')") and let "0.digits(base=10)" as it
is, but i think this is inconsistent or inconsequent.
-vgermrk-
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
