Thank you for this useful feedback!

aska...@gmail.com schrieb am Samstag, 23. August 2025 um 08:59:52 UTC+2:

> Hi, 
>
> When it's for me, for research, we're allowed to get an admin account 
> (after jumping a number of admin approval hoops). I still found it 
> difficult because the VPN is installed by deffect and cannot be turned off 
> even by admin and it blocks a number of things (on top of my head package 
> install, there may be other things). I learned to manually kill its access 
> every time I restart via Services but there's a limit as to what one can 
> expect the average user to know, figure out (or how much they dare to break 
> security policy). 
>
> In any case, that's beyond the point. Sure, one can "demand" but the 
> actual nature of the power relationship at many unis is a different one. 
> I'm sure our CS department would prefer Linux running in the computers that 
> their students use and tried demanding this but it didn't work, which makes 
> it difficult to run certain courses. I currently don't teach but when I do 
> again, if I want to run classes with Sage (increasing the teaching base), I 
> will sadly require a non WSL option (which, as I say, we still have as they 
> kept 9.1 although I suppose at one time it'll go). I also know that our 
> students would likely not manage to successfully do the current 
> installation (or give up). I know of the difficulties that the previous 
> Windows version posed. Perhaps Sage cannot simply run on Windows without 
> WSL just like programming (or maths) is not for everyone. But we were asked 
> for feedback, so that was mine, based on the situation here, not so much my 
> preferences. 
>
> I agree with the problems that MS products pose. I wish the issue stopped 
> with Sage. Email via Outlook is a daily nightmare (and expensive) but 
> again, we don't have the power to force IT go out of it (or the 'we' is not 
> large enough or has more survival battles to fight). Please, don't shoot 
> the reporter. 
>
> Best wishes, 
>
> Jesus
> ----------------------
>
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2025, 21:42 Dima Pasechnik, <dim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:29 AM aska...@gmail.com <aska...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> > I use Sagemath on Windows (essentially because my university only 
>> supports Windows, but also because I prefer Windows to other systems and I 
>> cannot really deal with having separate machines for programming and 
>> everything else). My university provides Sagemath on version 9.1 on the old 
>> Windows installer (and I fear they discontinue it once they find out that 
>> it is no longer supported). Using it via WSL doesn't work unless one has 
>> admin privileges and knows how to disable our VPN (which is something we 
>> are not meant to do, and that I am pretty sure they don't know I know how 
>> to do).
>>
>> It's just a non-starter. "My employer only allows MS-DOS, ChatGPT, and
>> typewriters" sort of thing.
>>
>> WSL is an essential part of Windows. Demand WSL support from your 
>> employer.
>> They need to understand that a lot of research software does not run
>> on Windows, and won't ever, most probably.
>> What does WSL have to do with VPN, or admin privileges (yes, one
>> sometimes might need to be an admin on the WSL vm, it does not mean
>> admin on the Windows box).
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I am saying the above because my feedback would be to get as close as 
>> possible to "no WSL" as many universities tend to disable it. If I 
>> understand correctly from your link, approach D may get close to this? If 
>> you have specific requests for feedback (i.e. if you want me to try 
>> something), let me know and I can do this in September.
>>
>> Approach D is very far from being done. It requires years of dedicated
>> person-year work, and the persons in question have to be very capable.
>> Unless Micro$oft or some other big company forks out a sizeable grant
>> for this to happen (and other funding just should not go there,
>> because more working on Windows software ports is mostly bringing more
>> benefits to their shareholders, the benefits to the society as the
>> whole from ports to Windows are negative!), it probably won't happen.
>> Life is too short to be wasted on banging one's head against horrible
>> M$ engineering problems.
>>
>> Dima
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks for making new Sagemath options for Windows users!
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Jesús
>> >
>> > On Monday, 18 August 2025 at 18:45:30 UTC+2 seb....@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > A big thanks, Marc.
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> > I am looking forward to testing it with my colleagues, students and 
>> friends, especially those on Windows.
>> >>
>> >> BTW: Eight months ago, we reactivated the sage-windows repository, 
>> which was once used to provide Windows installers for Sage via Cygwin. The 
>> goal was to create a place where we could share the current status of our 
>> efforts to provide easy access for Windows users and finally make such 
>> installers available from there. Unfortunately, work on the repository has 
>> stalled, primarily due to a lack of feedback.
>> >>
>> >> There are currently four approaches to obtaining installers for Sage 
>> on Windows, again. At least the approach marked with "C" still works for 
>> all Sage releases available on DockerHub. I suggest adding AppImage as a 
>> fifth approach.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> GMS schrieb am Samstag, 16. August 2025 um 11:10:33 UTC+2:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> A big thanks, Marc.  I am looking forward to testing it with my 
>> colleagues, students and friends, especially those on Windows.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>>
>> >>> Guillermo
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 at 10:56, Eric Gourgoulhon <egourg...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is great news!
>> >>>> Thank you very much for making this possible!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Eric.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Le vendredi 15 août 2025 à 16:34:29 UTC+2, marc....@gmail.com a 
>> écrit :
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The 3-manifolds project is now distributing a beta version of 
>> SageMath-x86_64.AppImage .
>> >>>>> This means that SageMath 10.7 can be installed and run on any 
>> version of linux which is compatible with manylinux2014 by downloading one 
>> file and marking it as executable.  The compatible linux systems include 
>> Ubuntu 24.04, Debian 12 and the default ubuntu image for Windows 11 WSL2, 
>> none of which are currently providing any sagemath packages.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This continues our effort to make sage accessible to the large 
>> group of users which includes most students and most of their professors 
>> and which consists of people who are not interested in, or not capable of, 
>> learning how to compile sage or maintain 3rd party package managers -- 
>> people who expect to be able to just download a program and run it.  While, 
>> as a reader of this email list, you probably do not belong to that group, 
>> we are hoping that you do have an interest in increasing access to sage and 
>> that you might be interested in testing the AppImage and reporting any 
>> issues you encounter.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> For those who are not familiar with the AppImage format, it is 
>> simply an ELF binary executable file containing a very small program with 
>> an arbitrarily large squashfs filesystem appended.  The small program does 
>> a fuse mount of the squashfs filesystem and then execs a main program 
>> located at the root of the filesystem.  The squashfs should contain all 
>> library dependencies of the main program, and all dynamic libraries should 
>> be loaded from an rpath pointing into the squashfs.  That way the AppImage 
>> has no external dependencies.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> - Marc
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "sage-devel" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/afeebaa6-19f8-4d46-b829-17be28f84db5n%40googlegroups.com
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/mbuGsrmkhpE/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq0v7t7ew8pi%2BZFJgSEP9YC4doYh0LBJMKzj7x_H7%3DWCwQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/2331c943-ac89-4761-81b4-51e8df7803a5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to