it is a Fedora bug all right, and they just pulled ecl in a recent release.
I was tempted to jump into Fedora development, to fix this, but, you know, I already have too much on my plate, and I am not even a Fedora user. Dima On December 26, 2025 1:58:03 PM CST, Nils Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: >Is it clear why in this case sage config didn't identify the system >offerings for prerequisites to be insufficient? Or is this a problem with >fedora where they ship an ECL that can't actually do what it's supposed to: >generate valid C code for the compiler the system offers? In the latter >case, I'd think that's a reportable bug to Fedora. It makes one wonder how >Fedora built their ECL package in the first place then: ECL self-compiles >to a large extent in its bootstrapping. > >On Friday, 26 December 2025 at 11:50:03 UTC-8 [email protected] wrote: > >Fedora system package maxima cannot be used, as maxima needs to be compiled >with ecl, with a loadable "maxima.fas" created, so that our Cython >interface can talk to it > >ecl system package cannot be used, as it is too old to be used with the gcc >toolchain. While ecl has fixed this in their master, they haven't yet made >a release with it. > >So you must build them both. > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"sage-devel" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to [email protected]. >To view this discussion visit >https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/370830ad-b3a7-40b9-9da2-134423a2fd51n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/2622B902-DBEB-4552-B6CA-EFA6068E492C%40gmail.com.
