Fascinating! What is the expected performance penalty? From a few tests, I'd say it's between 1 and 2 orders of magnitude slower than sage native code (25* to 50*) and 1 order of magnitude slower than Giac compiled to emscripten (https://www-fourier.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/~parisse/xcas.html), once JIT compilation steps have been done (before that, some initial computations are very slow). Not surprising considering the fact that i386 native code must be run in the browser.
On Saturday, February 7, 2026 at 10:36:12 AM UTC+1 Georgi Guninski wrote: > If you need a set of static files served from a web server, then you > can install some 32 bit i386 distro in a virtual machine (very easy if > you find the distro) and build 32 bit sage there. Probably the newer > the distro, the easier is to build sage. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/eee32e61-8a42-4748-b13a-68143459793en%40googlegroups.com.
