On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:53 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 9:41 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Apr 21, 2008, at 11:34 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> <SNIP>
>
> > > The number of bundles in trac is rather small and most of those
> > > bundles either have review issues or shouldn't be bundles in the first
> > > place [as you stated above], so applying them to a pre-3.0 tree,
> > > extracting the patch and so on should be doable.
> >
> > Did you still want me to do this, or is this a non-issue now that 3.0
> > is officially released?
>
> Sure, let's do it. So far only an informal announcement to sage-devel
> is out [aside from the big, fat reference on sagemath.org], but since
> we have to update HISTORY.txt as well as fix some small issue in the
> scripts repo it is something that can be done now. It won't make a
> difference for users, the inconvenience for developers will be small,
> i.e. we can keep an old style 3.0 around and rebase on that tree.
> Since 3.0.1 will see "bug fixes only" it seems like the perfect time
> to do so.
>
Hi,
I've made a trac ticket for this, since it seems to have got stalled:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3052
William
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
