On Jul 16, 8:54 pm, tkeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Thomas,
> I may have been imprecise. To clarify, zn_poly built, then displayed > this message: > Calibrating cycle counter... ok (3.84e+18) > KS mul: ............................... > KS sqr: ............................... > Nussbaumer mul: ............................... > Nussbaumer sqr: ............................... > KS/FFT mul: ............................... > KS/FFT sqr: ............................... > midmul FFT: ......................... > > This was ongoing for the 5ish hours I mentioned, before I accidentally > aborted the build process. The actual build process itself for > zn_poly went relatively quickly. I'll check the log after this > attempt finishes. Yeah, this is pretty much as I expected. The tuning phase should only take a couple minutes, so you either hit a bug in zn_poly or something is wrong with your RAM, compiler, etc. I expect David Harvey (the author of zn_poly) to pop up in the morning (east coast time) and ask you more detailed questions. > Regards, > Thomas What was the last version of Sage that did build for you? IIRC we did not touch zn_poly since Sage 3.0.2 or so, so unless something changed on your end it seems odd to start failing now. Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
