On Jul 22, 11:18 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2:55 pm, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> > I decided to have a play with the pycuda-0.90.2 kit for which I needed
> > boost_1_35_0
>
> Mhh, is 1.35.0 mandatory? We might have to upgrade boost in PolyBoRi
> then.
>
From the pycuda docs this would appear to be the case:

"...You may already have a working copy of the Boost C++ libraries. If
so, make sure that it’s version 1.35.0 or newer..."


> Ok, please let us know what you find out.

I'll keep this topic posted.

> Yeah, even sgemm could be useful and it would be nice if you could get
> some numbers of sgemm on the CPU vs. the GPU. Once the IEEE conform
> hardware is out things will become a lot more interesting.

I'm digging out the custom kernel now - so I should get something very
soon.

(I did integrate the CUDA BLAS library sgemm into mathematica ealier
this year - so I have some numbers on that also of course mathematica
suffers badly from the mlink serialisation)

Cheers,

Simon

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to