On Aug 21, 11:10 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I played around a bit with converting the tutorial this evening and > here are the results using the PNG images for the HTML output. There > are still some artifacts left from the conversion that need to be > cleaned up: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sphinx-tutorial/index.htmlhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/Sage.pdf
The pdf looks great. Everything except the math in the html version is good, but then the math didn't look that good in the latex2html version, either. You can probably tweak some things to make it look better (e.g., wherever you have $x$, replace it with *x* instead of :math:`x`), just the way you can with latex2html. My guess, from looking at the Sphinx documentation (and from the fact that you produced this so quickly) is that most of the documentation will be easy to convert, with a combination of regexp search-and- replace, macros, and editing by hand. The real work will be in the reference manual, since that's autogenerated, and no one is going to want to go through all of the source code, changing all of the latex to reStructuredText. Overall, though, switching to Sphinx seems like a fine idea. John > --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
