On Nov 3, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> > 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> > the way to the final 3.2. I plan to do another alpha3 in two days
> > unless I run our of time in which case we will have the first
> > 3.2.rc0.
>
> > Sources and a binary for sage.math are in
>
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/
>
> Built on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Core 2 Duo) w/o problems.
>
> Had 5 "make -j2 test" failures:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> this has been reported, but I just noticed that there is
> "significant bit noise", not insignificant bit noise:
> Expected:
> 6.1232339957367663e-16
> Got:
> 6.1230317691118863e-16
Ouch.
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/wester.py
> Reported
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
> See below
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_complex_double_dense.pyx
> Reported
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx
> Reported
>
> Regarding the matrix_group failure, it comes up with a different set
> of generators than expected. The odd thing is that when I run this
> test separately, it passes.
Which matrix_group failure?
> Justin
Cheers,
Michael
> --
> Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-at-Large
> () The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> /\ Help Cure HTML Email
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
