On Nov 5, 9:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?\
-1 - the will only cause more license proliferation.
> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
> countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
>
> I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
> a bit of overkill.
The GFDL requires one to add an invariant section to each document
published with it. That section is *pages* of extra input, so -1 on
that from me.
We should just use some sort of CC to keep it simple.
> Comments? Unless people think this is a silly idea, maybe I could
> start a new thread?
That is probably a good idea.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
