On Nov 23, 2:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > mabshoff wrote:
> >> Hello folks,
>
> >> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
> >> total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I
> >> guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches
> >> to go around :). The door before the big ReST transition is slowly
> >> closing, but I would guess you have another ten days before 3.2.1 is
> >> out. The source tarball can be found at:
>
> >>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/
>
> > On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
>
> > The following tests failed:
>
> > sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py
> > sage -t
> > devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py
> > Total time for all tests: 5315.2 seconds
>
> > sage -t
> > devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py*****************
> > *****************************************************
> > File
> > "/home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomi
> > al/multi_polynomial_ideal.py", line 58:
> > sage: S.<a,b> = R.quotient((x^2 + y^2, 17))
> > Expected:
> > verbose 0 ... Warning: falling back to very slow toy implementation.
> > Got nothing
> > **********************************************************************
> > File
> > "/home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomi
> > al/multi_polynomial_ideal.py", line 145:
> > sage: I.groebner_basis()
> > Expected:
> > verbose 0 ... Warning: falling back to very slow toy implementation.
> > [x + y + z, y^2 + y + 23234, y*z + y + 26532, 2*y + 158864, z^2 +
> > 17223, 2*z + 41856, 164878]
> > Got:
> > [x + y + z, y^2 + y + 23234, y*z + y + 26532, 2*y - 6014, z^2 + 17223,
> > 2*z + 41856, 164878]
>
> These are because you have the optional m2 installed. Michael's going
> to change the above two doctests to be:
>
> # optional - no_macaulay2
>
> since they currently can't really be tested if you *do* have M2!
Hmm, the above looks more like an issue with M2 returning different
results on 32 bit boxen or different version of M2.
Jaap: do you have M2 installed and if so which release? If you don't
have M2 we have an issue with the toy implementation of Gbases over
ZZ.
> > **********************************************************************
> > 1 items had failures:
> > 2 of 48 in __main__.example_0
> > ***Test Failed*** 2 failures.
> > For whitespace errors, see the file
> > /home/jaap/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/tmp/.doctest_multi_polynomial_ideal.
> > py
> > [13.5 s]
> > exit code: 1024
>
> > sage -t
> > devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py**************
> > ********************************************************
> > File
> > "/home/jaap/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_cu
> > rves/ell_rational_field.py", line 1183:
> > sage: EllipticCurve('14a1').three_selmer_rank()
> > Exception raised:
> > [...]
> > TypeError: Unable to start magma because the command 'magma -n' failed.
>
> The above should be tagged with
>
> # optional - magma
>
> Michael -- can you take care of the above two tags?
Yes - this is now #4599
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
