On Dec 5, 2:13 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
<SNIP>
Hi Jaap,
> > It would also be nice if you could open a ticket for the numerical
> > noise doctest issue you hit since the output from at least the first
> > example seemed truncated.
>
> It is now #4720.
Thanks.
> > And if you are still hitting that odd failure in combinat on FC 10
> > please open a ticket for that one, too. It might be a Heisenbug, but
> > experience has taught me that this is something that we will hit hard
> > sooner or later anyway, so having it in trac is a plus :)
>
> Don't know what you mean by that. Never mind.
I meant this failure:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.2.1.rc0]$ ./sage -t "devel/sage/sage/combinat/
root_system/type_dual.py"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/combinat/root_system/type_dual.py"
**********************************************************************
File "/home/jaap/Download/sage-3.2.1.rc0/devel/sage/sage/combinat/
root_system/ty pe_dual.py",
line 43:
sage: [[x.__cmp__(y) for x in ct] for y in ct]
Expected:
[[0, 1, -1], [-1, 0, -1], [1, 1, 0]]
Got:
[[0, 1, 1], [-1, 0, 1], [1, 1, 0]]
**********************************************************************
File "/home/jaap/Download/sage-3.2.1.rc0/devel/sage/sage/combinat/
root_system/ty pe_dual.py",
line 45:
sage: sorted(ct)
Expected:
[['A', 4], A1xB2, B2xA1]
Got:
[A1xB2, B2xA1, ['A', 4]]
**********************************************************************
If you ever happen to hit it again please let us know.
> Jaap
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
