That's fantastic, thanks for the summary. I wish I could have been there. Everyone involved has my thanks for continuing to work on the tough stuff.
Is there any plan for what would qualify as Sage 4.0? After this great bug fix, the tinymce addition, the reST switch, and other accumlated improvements it seems like a case could be made that 3.4 should be 4.0. I realize version numbers are maybe not hugely important, but I think it does help communicate that big improvements have happened. Cheers, Marshall On Jan 25, 10:37 am, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Sage-Devel, > > I've attached a very short final report for Sage Days 12. It gives a > sense of what went on -- bug fixes, etc., -- and follows up with a > short page summarizing the bugs that were fixed in each area. For > more details see: http://wiki.sagemath.org/days12/statusreports > > -- William > > -- > William Stein > Associate Professor of Mathematics > University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org > > report.pdf > 56KViewDownload > > report.tex > 5KViewDownload --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
