On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Carl Witty <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:14 PM, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I refereed #5318 which should definitely go in.  It is a major
> > performance mistake in the new multiedges digraph plotting code that
> > came up during the status reports today.
>
> I'm guessing you mean #5327?  Because #5318 has not been reviewed yet,
> and probably doesn't need to go in 3.3 (although I certainly wouldn't
> mind if it made it).


You're right.   I definitely meant #5327.  Thanks for the clarification.

William

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to