On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > So, to rephrase the question, does this mean that GF(5)(3) + 1 and RR > (pi) + 1 should fail?
And note that if the answer to the former question is yes, you lose this notational convenience: sage: K.<x> = GF(5)[] sage: 2*x^2 + 3*x + 4 2*x^2 + 3*x + 4 You would instead have to type 2*x^2 + 3*x + GF(5)(4). Carl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
