I think JSage has a slightly different focus. Specifically:

* It is tied to the Sage Python library
* It is intended for people who have a complementary publication in a
traditional journal
* The code has to be included in Sage and be maintained there
* The board of editors consists of Sage developers

What I have in mind is different:

* Not tied to implementations in Sage, but implementations accessible
from the Sage Notebook
* It would *be* a traditional journal (except that it is only
available online) - no need for a separate written paper
* The code could be in python, C or assembler, etc., in Sage, in
Macaulay, Gap or Magma, etc. - the only requirement is it is
accessible from the Sage Notebook
* The board of editors would be distinguished mathematicians, not
necessarily Sage developers (eventually there would be lots of people
who are both)
* The code examples, algorithm implementations need not run forever
and a day in the latest Sage - they would be tied to a certain
historical binary, e.g. Gap version x.y.z and Sage version k.l.m

And I would be interested in:

* Teaching expositions
* Survey papers
* Implementations of new algorithms
* Theoretical papers (where some significant portion of it relies on
computations which need verification or where computational examples
are given to illustrate it)

Both JSage and SagePapers could exist. I personally am not interested
in JSage the way it is currently set up. It's an extremely valuable
thing to have, just not any use to me personally.

As for finding distinguished people, perhaps I am naive, but I have a
few names in mind. I guess I am using my definition of distinguished
here. I don't care for having old boys club members numbered 1 through
3 on the board. Editors should be committed to the principles of open
verification, recognising the historical role of computation in modern
mathematics, the use of technology in mathematics dissemination, the
importance of clear exposition and a general disposition towards
valuing mathematics which has broad academic application and appeal.
There *are* distinguished mathematicians who have recognised and stood
for those principles throughout their careers. They tend to win awards
for their exposition and/or research or have a large body of both
computational results and formal papers to their name. I'd name names,
but that would be jumping the gun.

The one advantage an online journal has over a paper journal is there
need not be a page limit on exposition. A clear introduction to the
subject matter of the paper, no matter how technical, could be added.
I see this as one of the distinct advantages of this medium, along
with the fact that computations can be verified by any reader and not
hidden away in a broken implementation on someone's hard drive which
is never verifiable.

Bill.

On 12 Apr, 05:45, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> That all sounds great.  But first you'll have to find somebody
> "distinguished."  ;-)
>
> Seriously, I see no real reason there can't be interactive research
> articles, interactive textbooks and interactive classroom
> demonstrations, all with the power of Sage right at the fingertips of
> the researcher/student/teacher.  The combination of Sage, the notebook
> interface and jsMath opens up so many possibilities.  There are still
> a few rough edges on all this, but there's nothing insurmountable in
> my view.
>
> I wonder if there is anybody who has been tempted to get JSAGE really
> rolling?
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/library/jsage/index.html
>
> I think it would be a great vehicle for researchers and contributors
> to get formal acknowledgement for significant theoretical or
> implementation projects within Sage.  To say nothing of serving as a
> demonstration of all the ideas you've presented.
>
> Rob
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to