On Apr 13, 11:25 am, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> > Maybe someone should make one about "finite element methods" using Python.
>
> I agree, but SPD is much higher priority for me now:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/spdproject/
>
> and disentangling the sage notebook, so that it can be shipped without any
> sage dependencies. Then one can trivially use any python library (be it
> numpy, scipy or sympy or anything else) on any computer and also over the
> web, and also create all in all packages easily. I think that's what needed
> now.
Yeah, I have been thinking about how to make Sage and SPD play
together nicely, i.e. at the moment all env variables in Sage are SAGE_
$FOO while for SPD they ought to be SPD_$FOO. Getting this somehow
resolved would be nice.
By the way: SPD in Germany is the social party, so it does sound funny
to my ears :)
Another thing is that currently the dependencies for Sage are
hardcoded in deps. It would be much nicer if somehow each spkg could
provide some info that could be assembled in deps dynamically. That
way you should be able to assemble some project via SPD by just
providing a list of "key" packages and the rest would be put together
automatically. I don't have any concrete plans to work on this, but
maybe somebody else feels inspired :)
> Ondrej
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
