On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Tim Lahey <tim.la...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >> >> >> I think sympy will do very poorly if the assumptions are needed, we >> are still working on the assumptions. >> >> So if it turns out too difficult, just skip sympy for the time being, >> we'll get back to it later. >> > > The problem arises with all the different integration systems. Usually some > kind of simplification is needed on the integral returned, even if there > aren't > multiple solutions. This complicates the testing procedure since the steps to > perform the simplification are often specific to the returned result. > > I'm currently aiming to finish the test suite just for Sage/Maxima and > I'll go back > and address the various issues (like testing SymPy) once that's complete.
Ok, awesome. I am interested in all bugs that you find. Thanks for all the work you are doing, Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
