> The Sage worksheet at > > http://abstract.ups.edu/sage-aata.html > > contains Sage code that was not written in a notebook. While that > could be obvious if you actually looked at the file, technically I > think there is no way to prove just where I wrote it - notebook or > not.
Regardless of the how you wrote this, many people would consider your worksheet a derived work of Sage and thus say that your current license (CC) violates the GPL. > So originally, I had a copyright interest in this work. Copyright is different from license. You most likely still have full copyright over the work. > I could have > kept it that way, made it GFDL (or GPL), or use CC (which I did). So > I understand the answer to be that you can do whatever you wish with a > Sage worksheet (the notebook is the interface), no matter what you > (legally) place in it that you have the rights to. Possibly, which is part of my original question, but your example brings up a different issue. If you have Sage code (regardless of the interface) it is likely a derived work of Sage and thus bound by the GPL. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
