On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 at 09:16AM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote: > > Note that Python 2.6 includes a JSON module by default, so we might > > have to deal with these issues sooner or later anyway. > > Why are we not using this? (Or a version backported to Python 2.5, if > that would be needed?)
The same guy wrote simplejson and the Python 2.6 json module, so my guess is that simplejson pretty much *is* the backported version. (Or perhaps the json module is the "fowardported" version...) Dan -- --- Dan Drake <dr...@kaist.edu> ----- KAIST Department of Mathematical Sciences ------- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
