On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Tim Lahey<[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, it's slightly different than the Maple notation, which I > often forget since I don't use it.
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems that it's exactly the same as what's here http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/view.aspx?path=D . > D[0](f) seems strange when there is only one argument. f could be a function of many variables. > I still hate the notation. It's also fairly non-standard notation. At > least in Maple, it's mostly optional. Some functions require it, but > there is a function to convert to and from that notation when necessary. I don't think it'd be a whole lot of work to make GiNaC be able to use both notions. --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
