-bash-3.00$ cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_u1wos_19a SPARC
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 07 December 2005
-bash-3.00$ cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_u1wos_19a SPARC
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 07 December 2005
Bill.
On 6 June, 16:22, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[email protected]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Dr. David Kirkby<[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >> I need to do some other things now, so will return to this later. But I
> >> believe I've found some of the reasons Sage is not building on
> >> t2.math.washington.edu whereas it does on my Blade 2000.
>
> >> 1) It is possible the gcc 4.3.1 binaries in
> >> /usr/local/sparc-solaris-toolchain were created in a newer version of
> >> Solaris than what is running on t2. According to some people on
> >> comp.unix.solaris, doing this could cause problems.
>
> >> without knowing exactly what Michael used I can't be sure.
>
> > It was built on either this machine:
>
> > -bash-3.00$ uname -a
> > SunOS mark 5.10 Generic_127111-01 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500 Solaris
>
> > or this machine:
>
> > -bash-3.00$ uname -a
> > SunOS mark2 5.10 Generic_127111-01 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500
>
> Can you give me the output of
>
> $ cat /etc/release
>
> of both machines. It will be something like this:
>
> drkir...@kestrel:[~/sage/sage-4.0.1.alpha0] $ cat /etc/release
> Solaris 10 10/08 s10s_u6wos_07b SPARC
> Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
> Assembled 27 October 2008
>
> The 'u6' in the first line says this is update 6 on my machine, whereas
> on the t2
> kir...@t2:~$ cat /etc/release
> Solaris 10 8/07 s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC
> Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
> Assembled 16 August 2007
>
> wheras the 'u4' there indicates it is Solaris 10 update 4.
>
> I'm in the process of building gcc-4.4.0. Initially the build of it
> failed, but I think I have found out how to get around that.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
