William Stein wrote: > I have just confirmed that mark and mark2 have identical Solaris installs. > So I guess that wasn't the problem.
OK, that confirms my initial thought that the gfortran binary was too new is wrong. >> Either way, that fortran compiler is definitely a problem on t2, as even a >> simple example fortran program I downloaded from the web caused the internal >> error, so it's not some exotic code in Sage that is exploiting an obscure >> compiler bug. >> >> Anyway, the build of gcc-4.4.0 seems to be going ok (about an hour compiling >> now!), so hopefully that will help matters. > > Yep, gcc takes a long time to build. The gcc build is still going, though I did do 'make bootstrap' which means it gets built three times I think. It's been running over 6 hours now and still not finished! kir...@t2:~/build-gcc-4.4.0$ ls -l config.log -rw-r--r-- 1 kirkby 1093 28561 Jun 6 07:42 config.log kir...@t2:~/build-gcc-4.4.0$ date Sat Jun 6 14:02:36 PDT 2009 > David, if you are interested at all in making a new Sage GCC spkg (for > gcc-4.4.0), which works on Solaris (in addition to other OS's), that > would be a greatly appreciated contribution you could make to the Sage > project. You can get the gcc-4.2.1 spkg here, if you want to see how > it is constructed: > > http://sagemath.org/packages/experimental/ I'd certainly consider it. My maths is not very good, so I doubt there is much I could contribute in a mathematical sense to Sage. I'll certainly give the idea of creating a gcc package some consideration. > William > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
