On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Nick Alexander<ncalexan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Also, there are probably lots of modules and classes where an >> alphabetical listing is way better than the one they are in in the >> code since the alphabetical is at least consistent and predictable. > > I think that alphabetical is probably the simplest option. This > suggests that module level documentation needs to give the overview/ > organization that Robert wants. Carl Witty is the master of such > organization.
Note that in sphinx you can set the order by hand yourself by the :members: field like this: .. autoclass:: Theora :members: get_frame_image, read_frame I just checked that. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
