Hi Craig!
So how is the baby?????
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:03:21AM -0700, Craig Citro wrote:
>
> > What's the status on this one? I though that the bottom line of the
> > discussion at SD15 for this one (not to be mixed up with #5986) was that:
> >
> > - Apart from importing the cPickle sources into the Sage tree, the
> > patch was essentially trivial (a 5 lines change to the cPickle
> > code) and therefore easy to review
> > - It had some reasonable chances to be merged into Python at some point.
> > - Craig was going to push this upstream
> > - There were no simple alternatives
> >
> > And that in view of all this it was good to go in Sage, and would get
> > a positive review shortly. Which did not occur.
> >
> > Craig, Carl: could you please do this now or comment back why not?
> >
>
> My plan is still to push this upstream at some point soon, with the
> intention that it make it into Python 2.7/3.2.
Cool
> However, the release date for 2.7 isn't even set yet -- meaning it's
> still quite a ways off.
Ok.
> Honestly, I don't recall -- what was our plan for patching this in
> the interim? Or did we not decide on anything because we got
> sidetracked talking about #5986?
We definitely got sidetracked talking about #5986 ...
As far as I recall, the plan for #5985 was to just apply what's on
trac (i.e. one patch to import the cPickle sources and tests in the
sage tree and a 5 line patch on them), as a temporary measure until
things get fixed in python.
Are you ok finishing the review accordingly?
Thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
