Marc Glisse wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Torbjorn Granlund wrote: > >> Are you sure? Then I suspect that n isn't really 1 but perhaps n (and >> -1 is not a good argument to MPN_ZERO!), > > s/n/0/ > > That would make a lot of sense, as the implementation of memset on the > T2 tests n==0 whereas most other sparc variants test --n<0. >
Where did you find the information that the implementation on the T2+ processor is different to other SPARC variants? I will ask on comp.unix.solaris for clarification of this if necessary. Casper Dik is likely to know. That could certainly explain why it builds on my UltraSPARC machine, but not on the T2+ processor. This is yet *another* reason it would be good to have it possible to build MPFR with the Sun compiler. I suspect the compiler would produce code optimised for the T2+ processor if given the right flags. Dave --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
