Rob Beezer wrote: > On Jul 30, 10:04 am, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What did he say? I've only seen him speak on the History Channel >> (seriously). > > LOL. Topic is now graph codes, not Bible Codes. > > I think graph7 would be worse since then we'd have 7 bits to a > character and more bad characters. Maybe graph5? But seriously, how > about a standard like Base-64, which would still pack 6 bits to the > byte while using letters, numerals and + and /? I think this is what > PGP and GPG use for ASCII versions of binary objects. First paragraph > at link seems to say it all: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64 >
I think using the established international "standard" of Base64 is a good option to convert to. It should be easy to write a function that gives this "sage6" format of the graph. It would probably make sense to follow the other conventions of graph6/sparse6 (i.e., edge traversal order, etc.) Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
