kstueve wrote: > > > On Jul 27, 3:11 am, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
>> But for reserach purposes, symbolic results is a niche interest area >> and one where I feel Sage could be a 'must have' tool. But for general >> circuit simulation, I believe the tool shown is too limited. >> >> Would the oriiginal author of CircuitEngine be interested in >> substituing his numeric solving for symbolic solving? In that case, > I have been very interested in implementing symbolic solving. Well Kevin, if you are interested in implementing symbolic solving, then I think that could be a great addition to Sage. Certainly a look at the papers on 'Nodal' which was available for Mathematica http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/Articles/2225/ http://www.macallanconsulting.com/nodalinfo.htm http://140.177.205.65/infocenter/Books/48/ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel1%2F2219%2F11082%2F00503156.pdf%3Farnumber%3D503156&authDecision=-203 would be worth looking at. When I looked on Sourceforge, I believe there was a tool which did symbolic circuit analysis, but I doubt it would have the huge range of underlying maths that Sage has. What do others think about a symbolic, rather than a numeric circuit analysis package for Sage? To me at least, there are enough good free numeric based tools around. For symbolic, there are few if any. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
