On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Simon King<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Sage developers,
>
> I asked the following question in a mail to William Stein and David
> Joyner, but William suggested the discussion should be in public.
>
> Yesterday my cohomology package became an optional spkg. But there are
> a lot of homological algebra constructions that aren't in, yet.
> However, some features (e.g. Massey products) might soon be
> implementable. I am not sure yet, but end of next week might be
> possible.
>
> Assume that you are expert for a topic X, and there is a spkg about X;
> hence, you are a potential reviewer. How soon would you be fed up with


Well, "fed-up" might not be the word I woul dus, but in any case
it would be highly dependent on my current teaching load, which is at this
moment 0.. (However, classes start in 3 weeks!)


> seeing yet another version of the X-spkg? How long (as a rule of
> thumb) would you suggest to collect more features before publishing a
> new spkg version?
>
> Sage used to have a "publish early and frequently" policy, but I don't
> know if it is appropriate for spkgs as well.
>
> Best regards,
>   Simon
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to