forwarding Patrick Lacasse:

As being the user we are talking about,
I want to remember my original wish,
that u.n() evaluates to 2, not u evaluates to 2.
I also want u to keep its symbolic meaning of 'k+1'
so I can change k and u will change together.

Harold proposes a new method ".evaluate()".
 If so, the error message
"self must be a numeric expression"
should suggere "try to use .evaluate()"

I do prefer a unique .n() function,
but I understand the backward compatibility issue.

Thks for discussion,

Patrick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to