forwarding Patrick Lacasse: As being the user we are talking about, I want to remember my original wish, that u.n() evaluates to 2, not u evaluates to 2. I also want u to keep its symbolic meaning of 'k+1' so I can change k and u will change together.
Harold proposes a new method ".evaluate()". If so, the error message "self must be a numeric expression" should suggere "try to use .evaluate()" I do prefer a unique .n() function, but I understand the backward compatibility issue. Thks for discussion, Patrick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---