On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:09 AM, John H Palmieri<[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a general question, but it applies to this spkg: is it > appropriate for an spkg like this to inject its documentation into the > Sage reference manual? My impression is that this package has good > documentation, and it would be nice if it were available to the user > when it's installed. The reference manual is the natural place. > Should there be an "Optional packages" section of the reference > manual, where each package can put its documentation? > > John
+1 to this idea! Just make sure it doesn't involve using hg to apply a patch, since that might not work. But if there were a directory of rst files that gets "auto-combined" into a chapter of the reference manual documenting all installed optional packages, that would be great. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
