On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > > Pat LeSmithe wrote: >> Maurizio wrote: >>> Wouldn't be better if there was some sort of triangular end which >>> points to the exact thick (when they are plotted)? Without them, the >>> slider look a bit "approximate" or "inexact" :) >> >> A visible "notched" guide does not appear to be a built-in option [1]: >> >> http://jqueryui.com/demos/slider/#default >> >> How about an optional input field tied to the slider? Then we could >> sweep with a slider and fine-tune with the form. Or a spinbox-slider >> combination? > > > Does the old flora theme not work with the new jqueryui? Last time we > upgraded, we ended up keeping the old flora theme. > > > >> >> It's highly unlikely I can turn to this soon, but I did find >> >> http://code.google.com/p/jquery-spin-button/ >> >> The timeInterval option is nice. Demo: >> >> http://dev.screw-axis.com/sandbox/jquery-spin/demo/demo1.html >> >> How can we make it easier to extend interacts? Organize the existing >> controls as plug-ins generated from Jinja templates? Distill the >> existing Python classes down to a minimal required interface (callbacks, >> etc.)? > > > +1. +Whatever I can vote. It would make a huge, huge difference if it > was easy to design, combine, and layout interact controls. >
I think it would be utterly trivial to at least make it so the user can layout interact controls in any way they want. Anything more will be harder -- but just layout would be easy to implement, given a reasonable design. I'm all for it. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
