There has been some discussion on sage-flame, but since it is continuing here, I would like to mention that Bjarke's comments, which seem to me to be quite constructive, have shown a substantial weakness in the computer systems design aspects of Sage, since so few people involved have a substantial background in computer science (e.g. a PhD in languages/compiling/ related subjects). Asking a whole bunch of mathematicians for their opinions may give you some comforting feelings, but it might not get you the best answer.
I also doubt the assertions of some that attention has been paid to all appropriate resources, but that should be followed on sage-flame. RJF On Sep 20, 7:41 am, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune <bjarke.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wanted to spark a discussion about this because I have a perception > that it has not been discussed in a non-inflammatory way, and talking > about it in a non-inflammatory way might have people come up with > ideas where otherwise they wouldn't think about it. This has been a > valuable experience for me in how not to do what I had in mind, and so > I might be the only beneficiary. If so: sorry about that. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
