On Sep 21, 11:50 am, Rob Beezer <goo...@beezer.cotse.net> wrote:
> Hi Karl-Dieter,
>
> Well, I guess I *am* doing this as I put together something very quick
> and sloppy last night, which has helped formulate my ideas for a
> better version (this approach was due to some good advice from
> William). Let me know if you need something messy and incomplete, but
> serviceable, right away. ;-) Good chance I might call on you for
> some number-theoretic advice along the way.
Nope, not teaching it (or anything at all, in fact) this semester;
next up spring 2011. But I think this will help a lot of other
people, since Sage is so natural for NT and plus William's book is
already out there...
- kcrisman
>
> Rob
>
> On Sep 21, 6:17 am, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Rob,
>
> > Please do this! I am always having to do some hack in my number
> > theory class for this, and it is very annoying (as you have
> > discovered) not to have this. It is somewhere very far down my to-do
> > list for Sage. Actually, I'm surprised there isn't some hidden
> > structure where it lurks, as you suggest in your last paragraph.
> > Thanks!
>
> > - kcrisman
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
