Hi Rob!
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:01:15PM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Thanks for working on the LaTeX-graph code. I'll certainly give
> this a closer look soon, with an eye towards not "wreak[ing] further
> havoc." ;-) Have a couple of other things in the queue first,
> though.
Thanks!
I'll probably work a bit more on it in the coming days to handle the
cases I am interested in, and then pass you on the baby.
> Fidel Barerra and I both have some work to do on this front, so I'll
> try to consolidate all that into one effort.
Great. I knew I could count on you!
> I have absolutely zero experience with spkg's so I'm probably not the
> one to deal with dot2tex. Yes, I could learn. One day soon, I might.
I have very little: that has been my very first spkg! So far, it's
been painless, as it's plain python and there are no compilation
issues. I can reconstruct the full building instructions, which should
fit in a couple lines.
Ah, by the way, a question for spkg experts: the current dot2tex spkg
I built contains two separate python modules, pyparsing and dot2tex,
the later depending on the former. Should there be two spkg's instead?
Is it possible to state the dependency so that users could just do
sage -i dot2tex... and get both installed, or at leave have a useful
error message?
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
