On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:34:10PM +1300, François Bissey wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:27:51 Jason Grout wrote:
> > William Stein wrote:
> > > Dear Jason,
> > >
> > > The Nauty spkg is broken with modern GCC's. You're spkg maintainer
> > > for that package, so I'm letting you know:
> > >
> > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7439
> > >
> > > Of course, if anybody wants to fix this it would be awesome!
> >
> > I confirmed that this is a problem with the latest nauty 2.4 as well.
> > I've sent a message to the nauty mailing list.
> >
> That's a fairly well known kind of issue. getline has made it in the libc
> standard and is now in glibc. The problem is getline is a fairly common
> name for a custom function... So clash ensue. Two solutions:
> * if the getline form glibc does what you want migrate to it.
> *simpler just rename the function to nauty_getline for example
> a grep will locate every occurrence and a sed will take care of the rest.
> I can cook a patch that way if you want when I have time.
We got the same problem in our Nauty module in MuPAD-Combinat, and
just added a:
#define getline getline_nauty_in_mupad
just before the definition of getline in gtools.h. That makes for a
more localized patch.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <[email protected]>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
