On Nov 18, 11:28 am, Martin Albrecht <[email protected]>
wrote:
...
> PS: Having said that, I still don't like it. I think it's good practice to
> define what you are working with.

I agree. If a name isn't known, then an error has to result that
clearly says that, well, the name isn't known. Otherwise, debugging
wouldn't be fun any more.

I hope a convention like "any undefined symbol is a symbolic variable"
will not become standard. It would be a regression, IMHO.

Cheers,
Simon

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to