kcrisman wrote: > > On Dec 18, 12:36 pm, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote: >> [email protected] wrote: >>> I'm CCing this to sage-devel. For Sage-devel people, the full thread >>> can be found here: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/index.html >> Just an update on the JMOL front: Bob Hanson just implemented ticks for >> lines/axes in jmol, prompted by the discussion of what would be useful >> for Sage. Seehttp://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-11/new.htm >> (item 35). It's great! >> > > I can't remember - did the patches related to this for 2d plotting end > up being ready for/in 4.3? It would be nice to have a standard > interface for having ticks being (nicely typeset) multiples of \pi in > both cases, for instance.
I don't think the custom tick patches for 2d plotting have made it in yet. I think it would be very good to have consistency between 2d and 3d representations. Note that we can still use the matplotlib tick formatting and location classes for 3d axes---we just need three axes instead of two. Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
