William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
>> Is there anyone actively working on changing Sage's source so it builds with 
>> gcc
>> 3.4.x?
>>
>> Is there any point in trying, given the 3.4 series is so old and newer 
>> releases
>> of gcc are readily available on any platform?
>>
>> 'prereq' will exit for gcc older than 3.4.0 and also for the buggy 4.0.0, but
>> for 3.4.x it will just issue a warning.
>>
>> I see 3 problems with this myself.
>>
>> 1) The warning flies past so quickly on a fast machine, you would have to be
>> very eagle-eyed to see it.
>>
>> 2) I doubt anyone is trying to fix 3.4 series issues.
>>
>> 3) Solaris does ship with gcc 3.4.3, which means someone can start the build,
>> even though it will ultimately fail.
>>
>> I'd propose I simply update prereq to simply exit for any gcc < 4.0.1.
>>
> 
> Exit, but with a message about setting a specific environment variable
> that will allow the build to continue.
> 
> We should *definitely, definitely* not shut the possibility of
> supporting 3.4, just because nobody is currently fixing ratpoints.
> 
>  -- William
> 

This is now

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7352

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to