IMHO, this conversation should be a new thread, on sage-devel not on sage-support. (It was "[sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability". )
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > By the way, anything new about moving to the newest GAP version? >> >> Somebody should post a new spkg. Then I'll test it on Itanium and see >> whether or not it works. If not, then it doesn't go in, but we can at >> least report the problem again to the GAP list. Incidently, a long time ago I made an spkg for gap 4.4.12 http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/patches/gap_packages-4.4.12_0.spkg Perhaps it could be useful now or maybe one has to start form scratch. > William, > I emailed you few weeks back asking what exactly you mean by Itanium > environment, as I was unable to reproduce your problems on an Itanium > cluster I have access to--- at least not with gcc. > At least not in a stand-alone build of GAP. > Intel compilers showed to be trickier. > > So, once again, what exactly is going wrong with the current GAP on > Itanium, in your view? > > Dmitrii > > > -- > To post to this group, send email to sage-supp...@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > >
-- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
