> no_signals? signals_disabled? This would give something like: > > with no_signals: > ... > > with signals_disabled: > ... > > The current names in Sage of _sig_on/_sig_off are a bit confusing and the names no_signals or signals_disabled carry forward that confusion.
There is always a signal handler installed in Python. As I understand it, _sig_on, simply replaces the default signal handler with one that works better with C extension code. Likewise, _sig_off, doesn't turns signals off, it restore Python's default signal handler. Thus, maybe something more like c_signals, cython_signals, extra_signals, signals, etc. would be a better name. I am horrible at naming things though. Cheers, Brian -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
