Jason Grout wrote:
Thanks for clarifying. So apparently you feel David should have waited
to post something (hopefully!) like: "Sage built on Solaris SPARC and
doctests passed." or at least "no new doctest failures happened"?
Thanks,
Jason
For your information,
$ make testlong
ends with:
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/__init__.py"
[0.3 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/constants_c.pyx"
[11.9 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/callable.py"
[9.8 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 41636.5 seconds
That was on a machine bought for about $75 on eBay. On 't2' I'd expect the tests
to take quite a bit longer. Funny really, how a machine worth around $30,000 can
be outperformed by one costing less than $100, simply because the T5240 (t2) is
so ill-suited for Sage development.
Reports of successful builds, or builds with doctests passes are very frequent
on sage-devel. As has been pointed out, there are 11 replies to the announcement
of Sage 4.3.4 being released on sage-devel and none on sage-release.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or
reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
