On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:33 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Mar 19, 6:21 pm, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi David,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
<david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
<SNIP>
Does anyone have any comments on those, or additions?
The guidelines you listed above sound reasonable to me.
I agree, except for part of #4: "The author must provide evidence to
the reviewer". I think we should trust the authors: if they say that
it builds on Solaris, then we should believe that they have tested
it. They shouldn't need to provide anything except a statement. I
would also say that the reviewer should test it themselves on as many
platforms as they have access to.
Seems reasonable to me. I like the idea of a checklist--not all items
may be relevant for all spkgs, but it'll prevent a lot from falling
between the cracks.
- Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or
reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
