On 23 Mai, 14:29, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > On 05/23/10 01:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > > *Both* -ansi and -pedantic should be used for the best conformance to > > standards, though it will not be perfect. But I doubt the Sage library > > would build with those. If Cython could generate code that works with > > those options, there is some hope the library would build with Sun Studio. > > Sorry, it is -ansi and -pedantic-errors which would be needed.
For C, "-ansi" is equivalent to "-std=c89"... (that's perhaps not what we want) The more evil thing is that currently *all* warnings in the compilation of C/C++ Sage library files are suppressed by a *trailing* "-w", so nobody will see any warning unless he/she edits setup.py (even if CFLAGS are set to report them). (And they're compiled with "-O3", which implies "-fstrict- aliasing"...) The use of gcc's "-W..." / "-Wno-..." options in combination with "- Werror[=...]" or "-Wno-error=..." wouldn't be bad, too (if it was enabled on a compiler-sensitive basis). -Leif -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
