On 2 June 2010 19:28, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > There are 161 tickets here listed as "needs review": > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30 > > So review some. :-) > > By the way, is anybody interested in crafting an "editor" system to > help organize matching reviewers with > tickets that need review? This could be some new python code that
Yes. Perhaps we can talk about it at SD22 in MSRI? > queries trac and generates good > reviewer/ticket matches, and sends out nags. Or it could be something > more manual that is built on top of the editor system used by some > traditional paper journal. > > Thoughts about ideas for making the review system OPTIMALLY EFFICIENT? > > About a year and a half ago I wrote a blog post about our review > system not being optimally efficient: > > http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2008/11/sage-patch-review.html > That was very good. I will read it again. John > -- > William Stein > Professor of Mathematics > University of Washington > http://wstein.org > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
